Usefulness, Reliability, Quality, and Content of Portuguese Language YouTube Videos on COVID-19

Abstract Objective: To investigate the usefulness, reliability, quality, and content of Portuguese-language YouTube videos on COVID-19. Material and Methods: Three keywords selected on Google Trends were searched on YouTube, and the 60 first videos listed with each term were analyzed. Two calibrated researchers evaluated the reliability (DISCERN Modified Scale), the quality (Global Quality Score - GQS), and the usefulness of videos for the users (COVID-19 Specific Score - CSS). The number of views, likes, and engagement were also analyzed. The data were evaluated by the Mann-Whitney test and Spearman correlation (α=5%). Results: 59 videos were included. The average scores of quality, reliability, and usefulness were 3.0 (±1.1), 3.2 (± 0.8), and 1.5 (± 0.9), respectively. Two-thirds of the videos (64.4%) had low/moderate quality, and the majority (76.2%) were about signs and symptoms. The numbers of views (p=0.005), likes (p=0.006), and engagement (p=0.014) were significantly higher in moderate/good quality videos. The number of comments (p=0.007), duration of videos (p=0.004), and the DISCERN score (p<0.001) were significantly higher in videos made by health professionals. The general quality of the videos was positively correlated to the CSS scores, number of views, likes, and engagement (p<0.05). Conclusion: Most videos had moderate quality and reliability and low usefulness for the users.

Fissuras orofaciais: uma análise bibliométrica dos trabalhos apresentados em um congresso brasileiro / Orofacial fissures: a bibliometric analysis of the works presented at a Brazilian congress

Objetivo: Investigar a produção científica sobre fendas orofaciais em um congresso brasileiro, entre os anos de 2009 a 2019. Métodos:Realizou-se um estudo bibliométrico, observacional, pela análise de resumos publicados em anais das Reuniões Anuais da Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO), que envolviam o tema de fissuras orofaciais.Os dados referentes aos resumos (ano de publicação, local do estudo ­ unidade federativa, tipo de fissura, grande área de conhecimento, desenho, tipo de instituição,recebimento de fomento) foram coletados e analisados através de uma estatística descritiva e analítica. Foi aplicado o teste não paramétrico de Mann-Whitney (p < 0,05). Resultados: Dentre 28.578 resumos, 194 (0,67%) eram sobre fissuras orofaciais. A maioria deles envolvia mais de um tipo de fissura (n = 180; 93,3%) e foram realizados,principalmente, em instituições públicas (n = 128; 66%) das regiões Sudeste (n = 121;62,3%), e Sul (n = 23; 11,8%), sem recebimento de fomento (60,8%). A área de conhecimento mais comum foi Epidemiologia/Saúde Coletiva (n = 60; 30,9%), com predominância dos desenhos de estudos transversais (n = 85; 43,8%). Houve associação estatisticamente significativa entre recebimento de financiamento e maior tamanho amostral. Conclusão: Poucos estudos investigaram as fissuras orofaciais na SBPqO.Uma investigação mais aprofundada nesse campo de pesquisa permite identificar problemáticas que possibilitam a organização, planejamento e monitoramento da atenção especializada para os portadores dessas anomalias, assim como criar condições para uma descentralização do cuidado pela ampliação da rede de serviços para outras localidades no Brasil.

Aim: To investigate the scientific production concerning orofacial clefts presented at a Brazilian congress, between 2009 and 2019. Methods: A bibliometric and observational study was conducted, though the analysis of abstracts published in the annals of the Annual Meetings of the Brazilian Society of Dental Research (SBPqO), concerning orofacial clefts. Data referring to the abstracts (year of publication, place of study - federative unit, type of fissure, broad area of knowledge, design, type of institution, receipt of funding) were collected and organized through descriptive and analytical statistics. The Mann-Whitney non-parametric test was applied (p < 0.05). Results: Among 28,578 abstracts, 194 (0.67%) concerned orofacial clefts. Most of them dealt with more than one type of cleft (n = 180; 93.3%) and were mainly conducted in public institutions (n = 128; 66%), in the Southeast (n = 121; 62.3%) and South (n = 23; 11.8%) regions, and without funding (60.8%). The most common field of knowledge was Epidemiology/Public Health (n = 60; 30.9%), with a predominance of cross-sectional studies (n = 185; 43.8%). There was a statistically significant association between funding and higher sample size. Conclusion:Few studies have investigated orofacial clefts in SBPqO. An in-depth investigation in this field of research allows for the identification of problems that make it possible to organize, plan, and monitor specialized care for people with these anomalies, as well as create conditions for the decentralization of care by expanding the service network to other locations in Brazil.